Reciprocating rack.
von mgg942
Druckbare Dateien (15)
-
stlgear_retainer.stl
38 Ko · 6 280 Downloads
-
stlhandle_link.stl
61 Ko · 6 222 Downloads
-
stlhandle_stem.stl
178 Ko · 6 228 Downloads
-
stlhandle_sleeve.stl
261 Ko · 6 222 Downloads
-
stlbase_02.stl
486 Ko · 6 257 Downloads
-
stlhandle_output.stl
49 Ko · 6 204 Downloads
-
stlpart_l_01_15T.stl
539 Ko · 6 251 Downloads
-
stlgear_stub_12od.stl
234 Ko · 6 211 Downloads
-
stlrack_clamp_l.stl
59 Ko · 6 202 Downloads
-
stlrack_clamp_r.stl
173 Ko · 6 207 Downloads
-
stlgear_l_01.stl
803 Ko · 6 265 Downloads
-
stlgear_central.stl
1022 Ko · 6 235 Downloads
-
stlrack_03_l.stl
838 Ko · 6 212 Downloads
-
stlrack_03_u.stl
854 Ko · 6 204 Downloads
-
stlrack_02.stl
1.3 Mo · 6 240 Downloads
Beschreibung
A 3D printed version of mechanism #123 in 507 movements.
http://507movements.com/index13.html
A video of it in action is here: http://youtu.be/dfs8X2RW-1k
And an animation of the action is here: https://youtu.be/Wq4kBHMocGU
Printed in Diamond Age PLA on an Ultimaker 1. Designed in MOI.
The longest piece is the rack which is 241mm long. Probably too long for some machines so I've included an alternative design in which the rack is spit into 2 (rack 03 u and rack 03 l) held together with two rack clamps and 8-off M3 x 10lg button head cap screws.
If you can get away with the single piece rack (scaling down might work, I haven't tried it) then only 8-off M3 x 10lg button head cap screws are required (rather than a total of 16, that is).
Disadvantages of scalling down more that a small amount are:
- Holes for the screws will be small
- Parts that are a tap fit might become too tight and require individual scaling.